Drug
Cartels and Terrorists are Using Foreign Ties to Gain Access to U.S. Banking
United States authorities are investigating multiple
banks for sanction violations and money laundering. HSBC is being made an
example to send the message that the Unites States is not going to turn a blind
eye to these activities. Standard Charter Bank reached a $340 million
settlement with U.S. regulators for violating sanctions by doing $250 billion
in transactions with Iran. Germany’s Commerzbank and Royal Bank of Scotland are
facing charges of sanction violations. Wells Fargo & Co.’s Wachovia Bank
paid a $160 million settlement in 2010. (Staff2)
After its investigation, Mexico fined HSBC a record
$27.5 million (over one-half of the Mexico branch’s 2011 profits. (Staff3) “Mexico loses an
estimated $50 billion per year – almost 5 percent of its gross domestic product
– in illicit money outflows of different types, including money laundering,
corruption, and tax evasion, according to Global Financial Integrity, a
nonprofit research and advocacy group in Washington, DC.” (Flannery)
Six HSBC executives testified at the hearing,
including David Bagley, who announced his resignation as head of group compliance
during his testimony. (Hamilton and Voreacos) The U.S. Senate Subcommittee
ruled that HSBC was guilty of conducting 25000 transactions totaling $19
billion with Iran between years 2001 and 2007. (Staff2) The Mexico
subsidiary helped drug cartels buy planes through laundered money in Cayman
Island accounts. HSBC Mexico set up a Cayman Island branch that handled 50
thousand accounts worth $2.1 billion. (Rushe) Although there was a
Cayman Island branch on the books, no offices or staff existed. The Senate
Subcommittee issued a 335-page report that detailed how the financial
institution repeatedly failed to comply with money-laundering regulations and government
sanctions, and allowed terrorists and drug lords to filter billions of dollars
through the North America branch of the London based company. Additionally, the
bank violated U.S. sanctions when it conducted business with Libya, Sudan,
Syria, North Korea, Cuba, and Burma. (Hamilton and Voreacos)
HSBC opened more than 2500 bearer share
corporations, the majority opened in Miami, Florida, with assets of $2.6
billion that generated $26 million in annual revenues. Bearer share
corporations can secretly change ownership, which makes them a great way of
laundering funds. (Staff)
HSBC was fined $100,000 in April 2000 for making a
transfer that benefitted the Taliban, yet in the years between 2006 and 2010, HSBC
shipped $1 billion to Al Rajhi in Saudi Arabia, despite its links to terrorist
financing. The investigation showed that HSBC was aware that it was violating
U.S. sanctions by doing business with Iran. An outside audit by Deloitte LLP, confirmed
that HSBC completed 25,000 transactions involving Iran that totaled over $19
billion. Approximately 1800 of these were u-turn transactions. Until 2008, U.S.
regulations permitted banks to conduct u-turn transactions that go through
sanctioned countries but do not originate or end in one of those countries. Regulators
discovered that banks were falsifying documents to hide where the transactions
are beginning and ending in order to bypass regulations. (Hamilton and Voreacos)
HSBC is also under investigation by the U.S. Justice
Department, the Manhattan, New York District Attorney, the U. S. Federal Reserve,
and the U.S. Treasury. Although HSBC has allocated $700 million for fines, it
has been estimated that the fine from the U.S. Senate alone may be as high as
$1 billion. HSBC admitted failure to report 39 suspicious transactions and
reporting 1729 suspicious transactions after they were completed. (Staff3) “Paul Thurston,
chief executive of retail banking and wealth management, who was sent in to try
and clear up HSBC’s Mexican banking business in 2007, said he was “horrified”
by what he found.” Mr. Thurston also stated the Bank has doubled oversight
funding and adopted Global compliance structure. (Rushe)
Only
after the head of the Subcommittee, Senator Levin, declared he felt there might
be significant reason for regulators to consider revoking HSBC’s charter, the bank’s
senior executives promised changes and displayed remorse for their actions, or
lack of actions. The head of HSBC’s retail banking and wealth management unit
stated that HSBC will close the Mexico unit’s U.S. dollar accounts in the
Cayman Islands. (Rushe)
Works Cited
Flannery, Nathaniel Parish. "Could HSBC Face the
World's First Billion Dollar Money Laundering Settlement?" 30 September
2012. Forbes. 23 October 2012 <http://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanielparishflannery/2012/09/30/could-hsbc-face-the-worlds-first-billion-dollar-money-laundering-settlement>.
Hamilton, Jesse and
David Voreacos. "HSBC Executive Resigns at Senate Money-Laundering
Hearing." 23 July 2012. www.businessweek.com. 15 October 2012
<http://www.businessweek.com/printer/articles/287462?type=bloomberg>.
Rush, Dominic.
"HSBC 'sorry' for aiding Mexican drugs lords, rogue states and
terrorists." 17 July 2012. The Guardian. 23 October 2012
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/jul/17/hsbc-executive-resigns-senate>.
Staff. "Senate
report: HSBC 'allowed drug money laundering'." 17 July 2012. BBC News
Business. 23 October 2012
<http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18866018?print=true>.
Staff3. "Mexico
fines HSBC $27.5m for lax money-laundering control." 25 July 2012. BBC
News Latin America & Caribbean. 25 October 2012
<http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-18993476?print=true>.
"Unicredit 'in US
Iran sanctions breach investigation'." 26 July 2012. BBC News
Business. 23 October 2012
<http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-19384702?print=true>.
This appears to be way beyond an ethical question. At first glance, it seems like a deliberate violation of international law. If the question is asked whether these laws should exist, then there is an ethical question. If the firms involved are studied, and it is determined that other laws are being violated, the ethical question is moderated. The volume of violations suggest that HSBC has no idea what the laws are, or HSBC doesn’t care. The enormous size of HSBC gives it the “too big to allow to fail” category. Can international law break it up? Would breaking it up have any effect? Is fining the bank 50% of its profit in a given region going to affect the overall actions or push them deeper underground in the long run?
ReplyDeleteExcellent questions. One lawmaker brought up the fact that a large part of the banks in violation are based in London. A big question is whether banks with home offices in other countries respect the sanctions and regulations put forth by the U.S.
ReplyDeleteThere is so much more about this case. The main question is, are the banks going to stop breaking the sanctions and regulations, or are they going to find better ways to conceal it?
Now, there’s a new definition to “equal opportunity lender!” HSBCs Website states that their values and principles are as follows: “The HSBC corporate character defines the values and principles inherent in all our everyday dealings”. http://www.hsbc.com/1/2/about
ReplyDeleteWhere do companies like this go wrong? Is it executive personal greed, a lack of moral values, or such an inherent pressure to perform better and better for stakeholders each quarter that executives totally lose focus on values and principles…oh, and the countries’ laws in which they operate?